STEMskiller: Skill Set Map for Mentors of Early Career Researchers
RESEARCH AND SCHOLARSHIP: Academic reading and writing
[Writing specifics for different academic formats] [Research articles]
Abstraction and creativity
Definition:
Discussions of how creativity and abstraction can be fostered in the early career research context, including the roles they may play in improving STEM degree completion rates.
Useful resources on Abstraction and creativity:
Brodin, E.M. (2018). The stifling silence around scholarly creativity in doctoral education: experiences of students and supervisors in four disciplines. Higher Education, 75, 655–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0168-3
Discusses how many countries include creativity as a learning outcome doctoral students should possess, conditions for doctoral students’ creativity, and the experiences of 14 doctoral students in Sweden.
Daly, W.T. (1995). Beyond critical thinking: Teaching the thinking skills necessary to academic and professional success. South Carolina University. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED390338.pdf
While geared to undergraduates, this text provides clear definitions of creative and abstract thinking and provides ideas for improving various thinking skills in the classroom.
McGee, E. O., Naphan-Kingery, D., Mustafaa, F. N., Houston, S., Botchway, P., & Lynch, J. (2019). Turned off from an academic career: Engineering and computing doctoral students and the reasons for their dissuasion. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 277-305. https://doi.org/10.28945/4250
A large study discussing factors that discourage doctoral students, including stifling their creativity (p. 294).
Tags: IPS IA; IPS CritT; IPS CreaT; IPS PS; IPS R; CompTS; CompGS
Peer Review: None
Table of contents:
- 1.2. Academic reading and writing
- 1.2.1. Preparing to write
- 1.2.2. Writing specifics for different academic formats
- 1.2.2.1. Books
- 1.2.2.2. Dissertations
1.2.2.3. Research articles
- 1.2.2.3.1. Introduction to writing for publication
1.2.2.3.2. Valid scientific argumentation
- 1.2.2.3.2.1. Quantitative statistics
1.2.2.3.2.2. Justifying inferences, predictions, conclusions
1.2.2.4. Review articles
1.2.3. Grant proposals
1.2.4. Corresponding with others
Author: Stephanie Krueger
Peer Reviewer(s): None
Last Updated: October 22, 2021